Nebraskans raised in an era of Republican dominance have grown accustomed to sleepy statewide races decided in GOP primaries. But the television airwaves this fall hint at something different: a U.S.

Nebraska State Sen. Mike McDonnell told ABC News Prime anchor Linsey Davis that the push to change the state’s electoral college allocation “did not seem fair.”

An electoral quirk could mean rural voters in Nebraska hold the tie-breaking vote in November’s presidential election.

Nebraska state Sen. Mike McDonnell (R) explained in an interview Tuesday that he voted against the GOP’s effort to change Nebraska’s Electoral College system because of the timing and

Results of New York Times/Siena College poll of 680 registered voters of Nebraska’s Second Congressional District conducted from Sept. 24 to 26, 2024.

In today’s edition … New York mayor faces federal indictment ... Presidential nominees’ contrasting spousal visibility.

Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen (R) said Tuesday that he would not be calling a special session for lawmakers to consider changing the state’s electoral system to winner-take-all after one key GOP

Nebraskans have a lot to think about in deciding how to vote this fall. But casting your vote, that's pretty simple. Here's how you can do it!

Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen said Tuesday that he has “no plans to call a special session” to change the way the state allocates electoral votes to a winner-take-all system, ending an effort led by Donald Trump.

An effort to prevent Donald Trump from losing a potentially crucial electoral vote from Nebraska appears dead. Republican Gov.

A last-minute Republican effort to award Nebraska's five Electoral College votes on a winner-take-all basis - a change that would help Donald Trump's odds of winning the White House - appeared doomed on Monday,