Justice Sam Alito asked a lawyer representing PornHub if the site boasted essays "by the modern day equivalent of Gore Vidal and William F. Buckley Jr.?" The post Justice Alito Asks PornHub’s Lawyer If People Visit the Site for the Articles ‘Like the Old Playboy Magazine’ first appeared on Mediaite.

While considering a First Amendment case about access to explicit websites online, Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito appeared to be unfamiliar with websites such as PornHub, asking representing attorneys about the kinds of content available on such websites.

Death row inmate Brenda Andrew argued that Oklahoma prosecutors “exploited sex-based stereotypes and presented concededly irrelevant evidence about her sexual history.”

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito turned heads during a First ... a previous exchange between a fellow conservative, Justice Neil Gorsuch who grilled Shaffer about the percentage of his clients ...

The phone call centered on a former law clerk of Justice Alito’s. In the eyes of the Trump team, the clerk still needed to prove his loyalty to the president-elect.

You have essays there by the modern-day equivalent of Gore Vidal and William F. Buckley Jr.?” the jurist asked to laughter from spectators.

Even the motivations behind Barrett's rushed nomination were called into question, painting her as the vessel through which Republicans would finally be able to overturn the Affordable Care Act due to a case arriving at the court about the same time as she did in October 2020.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A sharply divided Supreme Court on Thursday rejected President-elect Donald Trump’s final bid to put his New York hush-money case on hold, clearing the way for him to be ...

The adult entertainment industry asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block a Texas law requiring porn sites to verify user ages Wednesday, and the justices wanted to know more about the sites' offerings.

Judge Juan Merchan has signaled his intention to sentence Trump to an " unconditional discharge " -- allowing Trump to avoid prison, fines or probation -- out of respect for the principle of presidential immunity, which takes effect on Jan. 20 once Trump becomes president.

But TikTok and some users say the divest-or-disappear law violates the First Amendment. The two lawyers pressing that point faced scepticism. When Noel Francisco, arguing for the company, said requiring the platform to be sold or “go dark” is a “burden on TikTok’s speech”,

The Supreme Court signaled it’s likely to uphold a law that would ban the popular TikTok social media platform in the US if it isn’t sold by its Chinese parent company by Jan. 19.Most Read from Bloomb